Amazon Q CVE-2026-12957 MCP auto-execution
Summary
CVE-2026-12957 is a high-severity trust-boundary flaw in Language Servers for AWS, the language-server runtime bundled with Amazon Q Developer IDE plugins. Wiz Research reported that Amazon Q Developer for VS Code automatically loaded workspace MCP configuration from .amazonq/mcp.json and launched configured MCP servers without an explicit user approval step, allowing a malicious repository to execute local commands and inherit the developer's cloud-authenticated environment.
AWS published bulletin 2026-047-AWS on June 23, 2026 and credits Wiz for coordinated disclosure. AWS says Language Servers for AWS before 1.65.0 are affected by CVE-2026-12957; its bulletin also pairs the issue with CVE-2026-12958, a symlink-validation flaw before 1.69.0. Because Amazon Q IDE plugins bundle the language server, AWS recommends upgrading the relevant IDE plugins to versions that bundle Language Servers for AWS 1.69.0 or later.
Tags
- ops
- operations
- vulnerability
- AI tooling
- AI agents
- Amazon Q Developer
- Language Servers for AWS
- Model Context Protocol
- MCP
- VS Code
- JetBrains
- Eclipse
- Visual Studio
- workspace trust
- repository poisoning
- cloud credentials
- credential theft
- CVE-2026-12957
- CVE-2026-12958
- GHSA-xhcr-j4j9-3gh7
- GHSA-6v3r-4p5c-mrp5
- Wiz Research
- AWS
Why this matters
- This is a concrete, vendor-patched example of the broader MCP configuration-as-code-execution boundary: a file committed to a repository can become a local process launch if an AI coding assistant auto-trusts workspace configuration.
- The dangerous blast radius is not just local code execution. MCP server processes can inherit AWS keys, SSO/CLI tokens, API keys, SSH agent sockets, repository credentials, and other secrets from the developer's shell or IDE environment.
- The trigger path fits normal developer behavior: clone or open a repository in an IDE with Amazon Q enabled, trust the workspace when prompted, and let the extension initialize.
- The bug reinforces that
.amazonq/,.vscode/,.cursor/,.claude/, MCP registry snippets, and other assistant/editor configuration should be audited as executable supply-chain material, not passive settings.
Public vulnerability detail
- CVE:
CVE-2026-12957. - Primary product/runtime: Language Servers for AWS, used by Amazon Q Developer IDE plugins.
- Affected runtime according to Wiz / GHSA: Language Servers for AWS
< 1.65.0; npm package@aws/lsp-codewhisperer< 0.0.113. - AWS bulletin paired fix floor: Language Servers for AWS
< 1.69.0is affected by either CVE-2026-12957 or companion symlink issueCVE-2026-12958; fixed in1.69.0with corresponding Amazon Q plugin releases. - Affected plugin versions in AWS bulletin: Amazon Q Developer for VS Code
< 2.20, JetBrains< 4.3, Eclipse< 2.7.4, and AWS Toolkit with Amazon Q for Visual Studio< 1.94.0.0. - Primitive: project/workspace configuration can define commands that are automatically executed by the language server after the workspace is opened and trusted.
- Wiz-specific MCP path:
.amazonq/mcp.jsonin the workspace root can define MCP servers; Amazon Q auto-loaded the file and spawned those servers with the user's environment. - Impact: arbitrary local code execution and potential theft of cloud / developer credentials available to the IDE process.
Attack shape
- Attacker publishes or sends a repository containing
.amazonq/mcp.jsonor another project-level configuration file that defines an attacker-controlled command as an MCP server. - A developer opens the repository in an IDE with Amazon Q Developer enabled and trusts the workspace when prompted.
- The language server reads the workspace configuration and spawns the configured command.
- The spawned process inherits high-value environment material such as AWS credentials, cloud CLI tokens, API keys, or SSH agent access.
- The payload exfiltrates credentials, validates cloud identity, modifies repositories, or pivots into cloud control planes using the developer's live session.
Defender heuristics
- Upgrade Amazon Q Developer plugins everywhere, with priority on developer workstations, build engineers, release managers, cloud administrators, and anyone who opens untrusted repositories. Use AWS's fixed plugin versions or later.
- Inventory Language Servers for AWS versions in IDE extension directories, managed developer images, devcontainers, golden AMIs, and remote development hosts; do not assume browser or IDE auto-update has completed.
- Hunt repositories and recent checkouts for
.amazonq/mcp.json, unexpected MCP server definitions, suspiciouscommand/args, shell interpreters, downloaders, curl/wget, cloud CLI invocations, or exfiltration destinations. - Treat workspace-level AI/editor configuration as executable: review
.amazonq/,.vscode/,.cursor/,.claude/,.gemini/, MCP registry snippets, and assistant settings in pull requests and dependency source archives. - Reduce environment inheritance for IDEs and coding assistants. Launch them without broad cloud admin sessions where possible; prefer scoped profiles, short-lived credentials, and explicit per-project authentication.
- Monitor child processes of IDEs and language servers (
Code,code,node,aws-lsp-codewhisperer, Amazon Q extensions) for shells, package managers, cloud CLIs, credential discovery, and network exfiltration. - If exploitation is suspected, preserve the malicious workspace, extension versions, process telemetry, shell history, IDE logs, cloud audit logs, and repository audit events; rotate credentials available to the IDE session after containment.
Related pages
- MCP stdio command-execution boundary
- Developer-tool config auto-execution
- Agent localhost control-plane RCE
- Sentry MCP Agentjacking
- LiteLLM CVE-2026-42271 MCP stdio command injection
Sources
- Wiz Research: https://www.wiz.io/blog/amazon-q-vulnerability
- AWS security bulletin 2026-047-AWS: https://aws.amazon.com/security/security-bulletins/2026-047-aws/
- GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-xhcr-j4j9-3gh7: https://github.com/aws/language-servers/security/advisories/GHSA-xhcr-j4j9-3gh7
- The Hacker News: https://thehackernews.com/2026/06/amazon-q-developer-flaw-could-let.html